Crabbe v Townsend [20161 EWHC 2450 (Ch) (07 October 2016)
The 2006 Letter was a binding contract between Fay and Lindsay, objectively evidenced by their conduct and signatures; estoppel by convention does not apply as there was no shared assumption or detriment; Fay is entitled to enforce the 2006 Letter and claim damages for Lindsay's breach, but must also comply with its terms herself.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 4205
- Parties
- Claimant: Fay Elizabeth Crabbe; Defendant: Edward Lindsay Townsend
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 October 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Chancery Probate Dispute / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claimant succeeds; 2006 Letter is enforceable; damages to be assessed.
- Legal Topics
- Formation of Contract, Estoppel by Convention, Administration of Estates, Executor Duties, Deed of Variation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fay Elizabeth Crabbe
Claimant
Edward Lindsay Townsend
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Chancery Probate Dispute / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2006 Letter constituted a binding and enforceable contract between the executors
- 2 Whether estoppel by convention prevents enforcement of the 2006 Letter
- 3 Whether the defendant breached executor duties regarding the share portfolio
Ratio Decidendi
The 2006 Letter was a binding contract between Fay and Lindsay, objectively evidenced by their conduct and signatures; estoppel by convention does not apply as there was no shared assumption or detriment; Fay is entitled to enforce the 2006 Letter and claim damages for Lindsay's breach, but must also comply with its terms herself.
Court Disposition
Claimant succeeds; 2006 Letter is enforceable; damages to be assessed.
Orders
- The 2006 Letter is declared a binding and enforceable contract between the parties.
- Fay is entitled to damages for Lindsay's breach of the 2006 Letter, subject to assessment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment