Tonstate Group Limited (in liquidation) & Ors v Edward Wojakovski & Ors
The court has both personal and subject matter jurisdiction to make a Bankers Trust order against Gil Wojakowski, given his connections to England, his involvement in structures and representations relating to the Extractions, and the presence of relevant assets and documents within the jurisdiction. The order is justified to enable the Claimants to trace and recover misappropriated assets, and the terms of the order are proportionate given the lack of cooperation and transparency from Edward Wojakowski.
- Parties
- Claimant: Tonstate Group Limited (in liquidation); Claimant: Tonstate Edinburgh Limited (in liquidation); Claimant: Dan-Ton Investments Limited (in liquidation); Claimant: Arthur Matyas; Defendant: Edward Wojakovski; Respondent: Gil Wojakowski
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Proprietary Claim/disclosure Application / Post Judgment Application for Disclosure Order
- Outcome
- Disclosure order granted against Gil Wojakowski; application against Edward Wojakowski adjourned.
- Legal Topics
- Bankers Trust Orders, Disclosure Against Third Parties, Jurisdiction (personal and Subject Matter), Tracing of Misappropriated Assets
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tonstate Group Limited (in liquidation)
Claimant
Tonstate Edinburgh Limited (in liquidation)
Claimant
Dan-Ton Investments Limited (in liquidation)
Claimant
Arthur Matyas
Claimant
Edward Wojakovski
Defendant
Gil Wojakowski
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Proprietary Claim/disclosure Application / Post Judgment Application for Disclosure Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has personal jurisdiction over Gil Wojakowski for the purposes of a disclosure order
- 2 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to make a Bankers Trust order against a foreign resident concerning documents held abroad
- 3 Whether there is sufficient connection with England to justify the order under internationally recognised principles of jurisdiction
Ratio Decidendi
The court has both personal and subject matter jurisdiction to make a Bankers Trust order against Gil Wojakowski, given his connections to England, his involvement in structures and representations relating to the Extractions, and the presence of relevant assets and documents within the jurisdiction. The order is justified to enable the Claimants to trace and recover misappropriated assets, and the terms of the order are proportionate given the lack of cooperation and transparency from Edward Wojakowski.
Court Disposition
Disclosure order granted against Gil Wojakowski; application against Edward Wojakowski adjourned.
Orders
- Gil Wojakowski to provide information and documents relating to assets held in the Wojakowski Brothers Trust and bank accounts of Gideon Wojakowski, including a schedule of assets over £5,000 owned by Maxima Corporate Holdings Limited and copies of all bank statements for Maxima worldwide since 1 January 2000.
- Claimants to provide undertakings as to use of disclosed information and payment of costs of compliance.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment