Tonstate Group Ltd & Ors v Wojakovski & Ors
Mr Wojakovski failed to provide sufficient, credible evidence of his inability to pay the costs order or to raise funds from other sources, and his procedural defaults and ongoing breaches of court orders support the making of a debarring order. However, the order should not apply to the Shares Claim, and should be made on an 'unless' basis, giving him 14 days to pay.
- Parties
- Claimant: Tonstate Group Limited; Claimant: Tonstate Edinburgh Limited; Claimant: Dan-Ton Investments Limited; Claimant: Arthur Matyas; Defendant: Edward Wojakovski; Defendant: TH Holdings Limited; Defendant: Tonstate Metropole Hotels Limited; Defendant: Summerhill Cardiff Limited; Defendant: Tonstate (Bournemouth) Limited; Defendant: Tonstate (Retail) Limited; Defendant: Tonstate (St Andrew’s Square) Limited; Defendant: Tonstate (Staple Inn) Limited; Defendant: Tonstate (Yeovil Leisure) Limited; Defendant: Glasgow Airport Hotel Holdings Limited; Defendant: Overseas Holdings Capital Group Limited; Defendant: Firststar Limited; Respondent: Renate Matyas; Respondent: Rachel Elizabeth Robertson; Respondent: Betchworth Consulting Limited; Respondent: Prakash Raithatha
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Derivative Action, Unfair Prejudice Petition, Claim for Rescission of Share Transfers / Application for Debarring Order Following Non Payment of Costs
- Outcome
- Debarring order made on an 'unless' basis against Mr Wojakovski in the Main Action and Petition, not the Shares Claim.
- Legal Topics
- Debarring Orders, Non Payment of Costs, Derivative Actions, Unfair Prejudice, Disclosure Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tonstate Group Limited
Claimant
Tonstate Edinburgh Limited
Claimant
Dan-Ton Investments Limited
Claimant
Arthur Matyas
Claimant
Edward Wojakovski
Defendant
TH Holdings Limited
Defendant
Tonstate Metropole Hotels Limited
Defendant
Summerhill Cardiff Limited
Defendant
Tonstate (Bournemouth) Limited
Defendant
Tonstate (Retail) Limited
Defendant
Tonstate (St Andrew’s Square) Limited
Defendant
Tonstate (Staple Inn) Limited
Defendant
Tonstate (Yeovil Leisure) Limited
Defendant
Glasgow Airport Hotel Holdings Limited
Defendant
Overseas Holdings Capital Group Limited
Defendant
Firststar Limited
Defendant
Renate Matyas
Respondent
Rachel Elizabeth Robertson
Respondent
Betchworth Consulting Limited
Respondent
Prakash Raithatha
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Derivative Action, Unfair Prejudice Petition, Claim for Rescission of Share Transfers / Application for Debarring Order Following Non Payment of Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a debarring order should be made against Mr Wojakovski for non-payment of costs
- 2 Whether Mr Wojakovski has provided sufficient evidence of inability to pay
- 3 Whether the debarring order should apply to all actions or only some
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Wojakovski failed to provide sufficient, credible evidence of his inability to pay the costs order or to raise funds from other sources, and his procedural defaults and ongoing breaches of court orders support the making of a debarring order. However, the order should not apply to the Shares Claim, and should be made on an 'unless' basis, giving him 14 days to pay.
Court Disposition
Debarring order made on an 'unless' basis against Mr Wojakovski in the Main Action and Petition, not the Shares Claim.
Orders
- Unless Mr Wojakovski pays the costs order within 14 days of the order, he shall be debarred from defending the Main Action (including Additional Claims) and the Petition.
- No debarring order in respect of the Shares Claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment