Tonstate Group Ltd & Ors v Wojakovski
Permission is granted for the continuation of derivative actions by Mr Matyas and TGL as appropriate. Indemnity for costs out of the assets of the yellow companies is refused due to the risk of unfairly burdening Mr Wojakovski's interest if the claims fail. Injunctions restraining TGL from using its assets to fund its own claims or the personal costs of Mr and Mrs Matyas are refused, as there is sufficient headroom in assets and any prejudice can be remedied by adjustment after trial. A cap of £3 million is imposed on TGL's use of assets to fund the main action, subject to further review.
- Parties
- Claimant: Tonstate Group Ltd & Others; Defendant: Edward Wojakovski; Claimant: Arthur Matyas & Renate Matyas
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Derivative Actions / Interlocutory Application for Permission to Continue Derivative Actions and Related Injunctions
- Outcome
- Applications granted in part and refused in part
- Legal Topics
- Derivative Actions, Costs and Indemnities, Injunctions, Shareholder Disputes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tonstate Group Ltd & Others
Claimant
Edward Wojakovski
Defendant
Arthur Matyas & Renate Matyas
Claimant
Procedural Posture
Civil Derivative Actions / Interlocutory Application for Permission to Continue Derivative Actions and Related Injunctions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission should be granted to continue derivative actions by certain companies and shareholders
- 2 Whether indemnity for costs should be granted out of company assets
- 3 Whether injunctions should be granted restraining use of company assets to fund litigation
Ratio Decidendi
Permission is granted for the continuation of derivative actions by Mr Matyas and TGL as appropriate. Indemnity for costs out of the assets of the yellow companies is refused due to the risk of unfairly burdening Mr Wojakovski's interest if the claims fail. Injunctions restraining TGL from using its assets to fund its own claims or the personal costs of Mr and Mrs Matyas are refused, as there is sufficient headroom in assets and any prejudice can be remedied by adjustment after trial. A cap of £3 million is imposed on TGL's use of assets to fund the main action, subject to further review.
Court Disposition
Applications granted in part and refused in part
Orders
- Permission granted to Mr Matyas to continue actions by the yellow companies as double derivative actions
- Permission granted to TGL to commence derivative actions on behalf of the red companies
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment