Tonstate Group Ltd & Ors v Wojakovski & Ors
The Duomatic principle cannot be used to ratify breaches of fiduciary duty where the underlying transaction is unlawful and could not have been lawfully carried out by the company, regardless of unanimous shareholder approval.
- Parties
- Claimant: Tonstate Group Limited; Claimant: Tonstate Edinburgh Limited; Claimant: Dan-Ton Investments Limited; Claimant: Arthur Matyas; Defendant: Edward Wojakovski; Defendant: TH Holdings Limited; Defendant: Tonstate Metropole Hotels Limited; Defendant: Summerhill Cardiff Limited; Defendant: Tonstate (Bournemouth) Limited; Defendant: Tonstate (Retail) Limited; Defendant: Tonstate (St Andrew’s Square) Limited; Defendant: Tonstate (Staple Inn) Limited; Defendant: Tonstate (Yeovil Leisure) Limited; Defendant: Glasgow Airport Hotel Holdings Limited; Defendant: Overseas Holdings Capital Group Limited; Defendant: Firststar Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Derivative Action / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Part of Defence
- Outcome
- Application granted; relevant paragraphs of the defence struck out.
- Legal Topics
- Directors' Duties, Ratification of Breach of Duty, Duomatic Principle, Illegality in Company Transactions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tonstate Group Limited
Claimant
Tonstate Edinburgh Limited
Claimant
Dan-Ton Investments Limited
Claimant
Arthur Matyas
Claimant
Edward Wojakovski
Defendant
TH Holdings Limited
Defendant
Tonstate Metropole Hotels Limited
Defendant
Summerhill Cardiff Limited
Defendant
Tonstate (Bournemouth) Limited
Defendant
Tonstate (Retail) Limited
Defendant
Tonstate (St Andrew’s Square) Limited
Defendant
Tonstate (Staple Inn) Limited
Defendant
Tonstate (Yeovil Leisure) Limited
Defendant
Glasgow Airport Hotel Holdings Limited
Defendant
Overseas Holdings Capital Group Limited
Defendant
Firststar Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Derivative Action / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Part of Defence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Duomatic principle can ratify breaches of fiduciary duty involving unlawful conduct
- 2 Whether informal shareholder approval can validate transactions that the company could not lawfully undertake
Ratio Decidendi
The Duomatic principle cannot be used to ratify breaches of fiduciary duty where the underlying transaction is unlawful and could not have been lawfully carried out by the company, regardless of unanimous shareholder approval.
Court Disposition
Application granted; relevant paragraphs of the defence struck out.
Orders
- Relevant paragraphs of Edward Wojakovski's defence based on the Duomatic principle are struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment