TONSTATE GROUP LIMITED v EDWARD WOJAKOVSKI AND 11 ORS

TONSTATE GROUP LIMITED v EDWARD WOJAKOVSKI AND 11 ORS

Given the serious issue of capacity raised by Mr Wojakovski's solicitor, it is necessary to stay both the contempt and related bankruptcy proceedings pending a psychiatric report on capacity. An open-ended stay is not appropriate; a clear timetable is required. Abuse of process will not be tolerated by allowing inconsistent positions on capacity in parallel proceedings.

Parties
Claimant: Tonstate Group Limited; Claimant: Tonstate Edinburgh Limited (In Liquidation); Claimant: Dan-Ton Investments Limited (In Liquidation); Claimant: Arthur Matyas; Defendant: Edward Wojakovski; Interested Party: Trustees in Bankruptcy of Edward Wojakovski
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 February 2022
Procedural Posture
Contempt Application / Directions Hearing
Outcome
Stay granted in both contempt and related bankruptcy proceedings pending psychiatric report on capacity; timetable set for report production.
Legal Topics
Mental Capacity, Stay of Proceedings, Legal Aid, Litigation Friend, Abuse of Process
Civil Procedure Bankruptcy Contempt of Court Mental Capacity Stay of Proceedings Legal Aid Litigation Friend Abuse of Process

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tonstate Group Limited

Claimant

Tonstate Edinburgh Limited (In Liquidation)

Claimant

Dan-Ton Investments Limited (In Liquidation)

Claimant

Arthur Matyas

Claimant

Edward Wojakovski

Defendant

Trustees in Bankruptcy of Edward Wojakovski

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Contempt Application / Directions Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether contempt proceedings against Mr Wojakovski should be stayed pending assessment of his mental capacity
  2. 2 Whether related bankruptcy proceedings should also be stayed due to capacity concerns
  3. 3 Proper procedure for appointment of litigation friend under CPR 21.5 and 21.6

Ratio Decidendi

Given the serious issue of capacity raised by Mr Wojakovski's solicitor, it is necessary to stay both the contempt and related bankruptcy proceedings pending a psychiatric report on capacity. An open-ended stay is not appropriate; a clear timetable is required. Abuse of process will not be tolerated by allowing inconsistent positions on capacity in parallel proceedings.

Court Disposition

Stay granted in both contempt and related bankruptcy proceedings pending psychiatric report on capacity; timetable set for report production.

Orders

  • Mr Wojakovski to obtain psychiatric report by 31 March 2022.
  • Claimants may commission their own report if they dispute findings.