Advanced Control Systems Inc v Efacec Engenharia e Sistemas SA
The paragraphs sought to be struck out serve a proper purpose and are not so vague or incoherent as to warrant strike out; however, the Counterclaim lacks adequate particularisation and the defendant must replead with proper particulars to enable case management and trial.
- Parties
- Claimant: Advanced Control Systems, Inc; Defendant: Efacec Engenharia e Sistemas SA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Dispute / Interlocutory Application (strike Out and Further Particulars)
- Outcome
- Application to strike out dismissed; application for further particulars granted.
- Legal Topics
- Pleading Requirements, Particularisation, Strike Out Applications, Economic Duress, Global Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Advanced Control Systems, Inc
Claimant
Efacec Engenharia e Sistemas SA
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Dispute / Interlocutory Application (strike Out and Further Particulars)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether paragraphs of the Defence and Counterclaim should be struck out for lack of particularisation
- 2 Whether the defendant should be required to provide further particulars of its Counterclaim
Ratio Decidendi
The paragraphs sought to be struck out serve a proper purpose and are not so vague or incoherent as to warrant strike out; however, the Counterclaim lacks adequate particularisation and the defendant must replead with proper particulars to enable case management and trial.
Court Disposition
Application to strike out dismissed; application for further particulars granted.
Orders
- Defendant to replead Counterclaim with appropriate particulars.
- Claimant awarded costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment