Darwish v Egyptair Ltd. [2006] EWHC 1399 (QB) (16 June 2006)

Darwish v Egyptair Ltd. [2006] EWHC 1399 (QB) (16 June 2006)

The court found that the defendant's words were bravado without intent to threaten immediate violence, no aggressive movement was made, and the claimant did not in fact apprehend an imminent attack; therefore, no assault occurred.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2006] EWHC 1399
Parties
Claimant: Alaa-Eldin Darwish; Defendant: Egyptair Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 June 2006
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Claim (assault) / Trial on Liability (excluding Causation and Quantum)
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Assault, Personal Injury, Workplace Conduct
Tort Law Employment Law Assault Personal Injury Workplace Conduct

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alaa-Eldin Darwish

Claimant

Egyptair Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury Claim (assault) / Trial on Liability (excluding Causation and Quantum)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant committed an assault against the claimant on 23 January 2002

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant's words were bravado without intent to threaten immediate violence, no aggressive movement was made, and the claimant did not in fact apprehend an imminent attack; therefore, no assault occurred.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed