Robinson v Department for Work And Pensions
The Employment Tribunal’s findings of fact did not establish that the claimant was subjected to unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of her disability, nor did they engage with the relevant managers’ thought processes as required by law. The ET’s rejection of the reasonable adjustments...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Elaine Robinson; Respondent: Department for Work and Pensions
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Disability Discrimination, Reasonable Adjustments, Remittal, Burden of Proof
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Elaine Robinson
Appellant
Department for Work and Pensions
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in finding discrimination arising from disability under s 15 Equality Act 2010
- 2 Whether the Employment Appeal Tribunal was correct not to remit the case to the Employment Tribunal
- 3 Whether the ET made sufficient findings of fact to justify shifting the burden of proof under s 136 Equality Act 2010
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal’s findings of fact did not establish that the claimant was subjected to unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of her disability, nor did they engage with the relevant managers’ thought processes as required by law. The ET’s rejection of the reasonable adjustments claim under s 20 Equality Act 2010 was incompatible with upholding the s 15 claim. Therefore, the s 15 claim must fail and the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment