Al- Amoudi v Kifle [2011] EWHC 2037 (QB) (29 July 2011)

Al- Amoudi v Kifle [2011] EWHC 2037 (QB) (29 July 2011)

The article published by the defendant bore the defamatory meanings pleaded by the claimant, including allegations of disgraceful conduct, terrorism financing, probable responsibility for murder, and pursuit of his daughter for execution. The publication was substantial among the Ethiopian community in the UK, and the defendant aggravated the harm by repeating the libels and abusing the claimant and his lawyers. The appropriate award of damages, considering the gravity of the allegations, extent of publication, and aggravating conduct, is £175,000.

Citation
[2011] EWHC 2037
Parties
Claimant: Mohammed Hussein Al-Amoudi; Defendant: Elias Kifle
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 July 2011
Procedural Posture
Libel Action (defamation) / Assessment of Damages Following Default Judgment
Outcome
Damages awarded to claimant
Legal Topics
Libel, Damages Assessment, Default Judgment, Jurisdiction, Vindication of Reputation
Defamation Media Law Tort Libel Damages Assessment Default Judgment Jurisdiction Vindication of Reputation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohammed Hussein Al-Amoudi

Claimant

Elias Kifle

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Libel Action (defamation) / Assessment of Damages Following Default Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What defamatory meanings did the article bear?
  2. 2 What is the appropriate amount of damages for the libel published by the defendant against the claimant?
  3. 3 What is the extent and impact of publication in the jurisdiction?

Ratio Decidendi

The article published by the defendant bore the defamatory meanings pleaded by the claimant, including allegations of disgraceful conduct, terrorism financing, probable responsibility for murder, and pursuit of his daughter for execution. The publication was substantial among the Ethiopian community in the UK, and the defendant aggravated the harm by repeating the libels and abusing the claimant and his lawyers. The appropriate award of damages, considering the gravity of the allegations, extent of publication, and aggravating conduct, is £175,000.

Court Disposition

Damages awarded to claimant

Orders

  • Defendant to pay claimant £175,000 in general damages for libel