REGINA v ELIJAH MORGAN

REGINA v ELIJAH MORGAN

The court held that the trial judge was entitled to admit PC Barton's identification evidence and to reject the submission of no case to answer. The dash-cam footage was of sufficient quality, PC Barton was sufficiently familiar with the applicant, and any procedural breaches went to weight, not admissibility. The directions to the jury were adequate to address any risk of prejudice.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Applicant: Elijah Morgan
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 March 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
application for leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Identification Evidence, Admissibility of Evidence, Murder, Appeal Procedure
Criminal Law Identification Evidence Admissibility of Evidence Murder Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Elijah Morgan

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in admitting PC Barton's identification evidence under s.78 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge was wrong to reject the submission of no case to answer based on the quality and reliability of the identification evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the trial judge was entitled to admit PC Barton's identification evidence and to reject the submission of no case to answer. The dash-cam footage was of sufficient quality, PC Barton was sufficiently familiar with the applicant, and any procedural breaches went to weight, not admissibility. The directions to the jury were adequate to address any risk of prejudice.

Court Disposition

application for leave to appeal refused

Orders

  • Time to renew application for leave to appeal extended by six days
  • Permission to appeal refused