Basildon Borough Council v Saunders & Ors (Re Costs) [2025] EWHC 127 (KB) (24 January 2025)
The fifth defendant was the successful party at the final hearing, having resisted a final mandatory injunction for eviction. The claimant failed to conduct a welfare assessment or review proportionality after new evidence emerged. The general rule on costs applies, and the claimant must pay the fifth defendant's costs from 18 October 2024, with 50% payable on account.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 127 (KB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Basildon Borough Council; Defendant: Eliza Saunders; Defendant: John Burton Jnr; Defendant: John Burton Snr; Defendant: George Cook; Defendant: Shannon Greaves; Defendant: Elizabeth Cooper; Defendant: William Homes; Defendant: Elizabeth Coyle; Defendant: Persons Unknown (Undertaking operational development on land known as land to the rear of Sunnyside, Lower Avenue, Bowers Gifford, Basildon, Essex without a lawful planning consent and/or seeking to change the use of the land including a change in use to a caravan site without lawful planning consent)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Injunction (planning Enforcement) / Costs Judgment Following Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Claimant ordered to pay fifth defendant's costs from 18 October 2024, with 50% on account, subject to detailed assessment.
- Legal Topics
- Injunctions, Planning Enforcement, Costs Orders, Welfare Assessment, Proportionality
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Basildon Borough Council
Claimant
Eliza Saunders
Defendant
John Burton Jnr
Defendant
John Burton Snr
Defendant
George Cook
Defendant
Shannon Greaves
Defendant
Elizabeth Cooper
Defendant
William Homes
Defendant
Elizabeth Coyle
Defendant
Persons Unknown (Undertaking operational development on land known as land to the rear of Sunnyside, Lower Avenue, Bowers Gifford, Basildon, Essex without a lawful planning consent and/or seeking to change the use of the land including a change in use to a caravan site without lawful planning consent)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Injunction (planning Enforcement) / Costs Judgment Following Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant should pay the fifth defendant's costs after resisting a final mandatory injunction
- 2 Whether the claimant failed to conduct a welfare assessment before seeking final injunctive relief
- 3 Whether the general rule on costs under CPR 44.2 applies in favour of the fifth defendant
Ratio Decidendi
The fifth defendant was the successful party at the final hearing, having resisted a final mandatory injunction for eviction. The claimant failed to conduct a welfare assessment or review proportionality after new evidence emerged. The general rule on costs applies, and the claimant must pay the fifth defendant's costs from 18 October 2024, with 50% payable on account.
Court Disposition
Claimant ordered to pay fifth defendant's costs from 18 October 2024, with 50% on account, subject to detailed assessment.
Orders
- Costs in the case, save between the claimant and the fifth defendant as provided below.
- The claimant shall pay the fifth defendant's costs including those occasioned by costs submissions since 18 October 2024, such costs, if not agreed, to be subject of detailed assessment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment