Basildon Borough Council v Eliza Saunders & Ors
The fifth defendant was the successful party at the final hearing, having resisted a final mandatory injunction requiring her and her children to vacate the land. The claimant failed to reassess its position after new evidence emerged and rejected a reasonable pre-hearing concession. Therefore, the claimant should pay the fifth defendant's costs from 18 October 2024, with 50% payable on account within 28 days.
- Parties
- Claimant: Basildon Borough Council; Defendant: Eliza Saunders; Defendant: John Burton Jnr; Defendant: John Burton Snr; Defendant: George Cook; Defendant: Shannon Greaves; Defendant: Elizabeth Cooper; Defendant: William Homes; Defendant: Elizabeth Coyle; Defendant: Persons Unknown (Undertaking Operational Development on Land Known as Land to the Rear of Sunnyside, Lower Avenue, Bowers Gifford, Basildon, Essex Without a Lawful Planning Consent and/or Seeking to Change the Use of the Land Including a Change in Use to a Caravan Site Without Lawful Planning Consent)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (planning Injunction) / Costs Judgment After Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Claimant to pay fifth defendant's costs from 18 October 2024, with 50% on account within 28 days; detailed assessment of legally aided costs; costs in the case for other parties.
- Legal Topics
- Injunctions, Costs, Enforcement Notices, Planning Appeals, Legal Aid
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Basildon Borough Council
Claimant
Eliza Saunders
Defendant
John Burton Jnr
Defendant
John Burton Snr
Defendant
George Cook
Defendant
Shannon Greaves
Defendant
Elizabeth Cooper
Defendant
William Homes
Defendant
Elizabeth Coyle
Defendant
Persons Unknown (Undertaking Operational Development on Land Known as Land to the Rear of Sunnyside, Lower Avenue, Bowers Gifford, Basildon, Essex Without a Lawful Planning Consent and/or Seeking to Change the Use of the Land Including a Change in Use to a Caravan Site Without Lawful Planning Consent)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (planning Injunction) / Costs Judgment After Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant or the fifth defendant should bear the costs of the final hearing regarding the application for a final mandatory injunction
- 2 Whether the claimant acted proportionately in pursuing a final injunction after new evidence emerged
- 3 Whether the general rule on costs under CPR 44.2 applies in favour of the fifth defendant
Ratio Decidendi
The fifth defendant was the successful party at the final hearing, having resisted a final mandatory injunction requiring her and her children to vacate the land. The claimant failed to reassess its position after new evidence emerged and rejected a reasonable pre-hearing concession. Therefore, the claimant should pay the fifth defendant's costs from 18 October 2024, with 50% payable on account within 28 days.
Court Disposition
Claimant to pay fifth defendant's costs from 18 October 2024, with 50% on account within 28 days; detailed assessment of legally aided costs; costs in the case for other parties.
Orders
- The claimant shall pay the fifth defendant’s costs including those occasioned by costs submissions since 18 October 2024, such costs, if not agreed, to be subject of detailed assessment.
- The claimant shall pay 50% of the fifth defendant’s bill of costs from 18 October 2024, on account of those costs, within 28 days of receipt.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment