Beeton, R v
The sentence of 4 years was manifestly excessive given the mitigating factors and comparative case law; a sentence of 3 years is appropriate.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Elizabeth Beeton
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 June 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- sentence reduced
- Legal Topics
- Perverting the Course of Justice, False Allegations, Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Elizabeth Beeton
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of 4 years' imprisonment for perverting the course of justice was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether psychiatric and psychological factors, domestic circumstances, and guilty pleas warranted a reduction in sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence of 4 years was manifestly excessive given the mitigating factors and comparative case law; a sentence of 3 years is appropriate.
Court Disposition
sentence reduced
Orders
- Original sentence of 4 years' imprisonment quashed and substituted with a sentence of 3 years' imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment