Regina v Deinde-Labiyi
The correct PPE calculation should be based on 10% of the total images served by the prosecution (1,891), not 10% of the PDF pages, as the images were provided individually and not as thumbnails by the prosecution.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Defendant: Elizabeth Deinde-Labiyi
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Under Regulation 29 of the Criminal Legal Aid (remuneration) Regulations 2013
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Litigators Graduated Fee Scheme, Prosecution Evidence, Costs Assessment, PPE Calculation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Elizabeth Deinde-Labiyi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Under Regulation 29 of the Criminal Legal Aid (remuneration) Regulations 2013
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the determining officer correctly exercised discretion in calculating PPE for prosecution images
- 2 Whether the calculation should be based on pages or individual images
Ratio Decidendi
The correct PPE calculation should be based on 10% of the total images served by the prosecution (1,891), not 10% of the PDF pages, as the images were provided individually and not as thumbnails by the prosecution.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Solicitors are entitled to PPE calculated on 1,891 pages for images.
- Graduated fee to be recalculated accordingly.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment