Abdelnoor & Anor v Barker& Ors [2022] EWHC 1468 (Ch) (14 June 2022)
The 2018 Will was validly executed, Pamela knew and approved its contents, and there was no evidence of undue influence. The evidence of the will drafter, Ms Braddel, was decisive, showing Pamela understood the changes and their effect. The claimants discharged the burden of proof for knowledge and approval; Elten failed to prove undue influence.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 1468 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Ramzy Edmund Jason Abdelnoor; Claimant: Gillian Nellie Stella Gibson; Defendant: Elten Herbert Barker; Defendant: Shelley Barker; Defendant: Sarah Brown; Defendant: Daniel Abdelnoor; Defendant: Rebecca Brown; Defendant: Benjamin Abdelnoor; Defendant: Nicholas Gibson; Defendant: Amy Doust; Defendant: Alexander Gibson; Defendant: Elanor Caunt; Defendant: Anna Abdelnoor; Defendant: Adam Abdelnoor; Defendant: Fabiola Kasume; Defendant: Sallyann Brodie
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Probate / Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim for validity of the 2018 Will allowed; counterclaim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Will, Knowledge and Approval, Undue Influence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ramzy Edmund Jason Abdelnoor
Claimant
Gillian Nellie Stella Gibson
Claimant
Elten Herbert Barker
Defendant
Shelley Barker
Defendant
Sarah Brown
Defendant
Daniel Abdelnoor
Defendant
Rebecca Brown
Defendant
Benjamin Abdelnoor
Defendant
Nicholas Gibson
Defendant
Amy Doust
Defendant
Alexander Gibson
Defendant
Elanor Caunt
Defendant
Anna Abdelnoor
Defendant
Adam Abdelnoor
Defendant
Fabiola Kasume
Defendant
Sallyann Brodie
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate / Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2018 Will of Pamela Mavis Anne Abdelnoor is valid
- 2 Whether Pamela knew and approved the contents of the 2018 Will
- 3 Whether the 2018 Will was procured by undue influence
Ratio Decidendi
The 2018 Will was validly executed, Pamela knew and approved its contents, and there was no evidence of undue influence. The evidence of the will drafter, Ms Braddel, was decisive, showing Pamela understood the changes and their effect. The claimants discharged the burden of proof for knowledge and approval; Elten failed to prove undue influence.
Court Disposition
Claim for validity of the 2018 Will allowed; counterclaim dismissed.
Orders
- Court pronounces for the force and validity of the 2018 Will in solemn form.
- Counterclaim challenging the 2018 Will dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment