RAMZY EDMUND JASON ABDELNOOR & Anor v ELTEN HERBERT BARKER & Ors
The court found that Pamela knew and approved the contents of the 2018 Will, based on the evidence of the will drafter, Ms Braddel, who took steps to ensure Pamela understood the changes and their effect. There was no direct or indirect evidence of coercion or undue influence by Jason; the changes reflected Pamela's wishes, and the claimants discharged their burden of proof.
- Parties
- Claimant: Ramzy Edmund Jason Abdelnoor; Claimant: Gillian Nellie Stella Gibson; Defendant: Elten Herbert Barker; Defendant: Shelley Barker; Defendant: Sarah Brown; Defendant: Daniel Abdelnoor; Defendant: Rebecca Brown; Defendant: Benjamin Abdelnoor; Defendant: Nicholas Gibson; Defendant: Amy Doust; Defendant: Alexander Gibson; Defendant: Elanor Caunt; Defendant: Anna Abdelnoor; Defendant: Adam Abdelnoor; Defendant: Fabiola Kasume; Defendant: Sallyann Brodie
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Probate / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; validity of the 2018 Will upheld; counterclaim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Will, Knowledge and Approval, Undue Influence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ramzy Edmund Jason Abdelnoor
Claimant
Gillian Nellie Stella Gibson
Claimant
Elten Herbert Barker
Defendant
Shelley Barker
Defendant
Sarah Brown
Defendant
Daniel Abdelnoor
Defendant
Rebecca Brown
Defendant
Benjamin Abdelnoor
Defendant
Nicholas Gibson
Defendant
Amy Doust
Defendant
Alexander Gibson
Defendant
Elanor Caunt
Defendant
Anna Abdelnoor
Defendant
Adam Abdelnoor
Defendant
Fabiola Kasume
Defendant
Sallyann Brodie
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Pamela Mavis Anne Abdelnoor knew and approved the contents of the 2018 Will
- 2 Whether the 2018 Will was procured by undue influence
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Pamela knew and approved the contents of the 2018 Will, based on the evidence of the will drafter, Ms Braddel, who took steps to ensure Pamela understood the changes and their effect. There was no direct or indirect evidence of coercion or undue influence by Jason; the changes reflected Pamela's wishes, and the claimants discharged their burden of proof.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; validity of the 2018 Will upheld; counterclaim dismissed.
Orders
- Court pronounces in favour of the validity of the 2018 Will dated 26 January 2018.
- Counterclaim dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment