R v Emeh
The 1,450 pages of evidence were of central importance to the prosecution's case and, following the principles in Hayes and SVS Solicitors, must be included in the PPE count even though they were not formally served and were treated as unused material by the Prosecution. The Determining Officer erred in excluding them.
- Parties
- Prosecution: R; Defendant: EMEH
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Appeal (criminal) / Appeal Under Regulation 29 of the Criminal Legal Aid (remuneration) Regulations 2013
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Litigators’ Graduated Fee Scheme, Pages of Prosecution Evidence (ppe), Electronic Evidence, Unused Material, Special Preparation Payment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Prosecution
EMEH
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Costs Appeal (criminal) / Appeal Under Regulation 29 of the Criminal Legal Aid (remuneration) Regulations 2013
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 1,450 pages of evidence should be included within the PPE count for the purposes of calculating the Appellant’s graduated fee under the Litigators’ Graduated Fee Scheme
- 2 Whether evidence treated by the Prosecution as 'unused' but relied upon in court should be counted as PPE
Ratio Decidendi
The 1,450 pages of evidence were of central importance to the prosecution's case and, following the principles in Hayes and SVS Solicitors, must be included in the PPE count even though they were not formally served and were treated as unused material by the Prosecution. The Determining Officer erred in excluding them.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The PPE count for the Appellant’s graduated fee is increased by 1,450 pages.
- An additional payment is to be made to the Applicant, including £500 (exclusive of VAT) for costs and the £100 paid on appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment