Claimants Listed in Schedule 1 v Spence & Ors [2021] EWHC 276 (Comm) (04 February 2021)
The claimants established a good arguable case in deceit and conspiracy, a real risk of dissipation of assets by the first, second, and third defendants, and that it is just and convenient to grant a worldwide freezing order and ancillary relief. The requirements for service out of the jurisdiction and enforcement in Florida are satisfied.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 276 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimants/applicants: Claimants listed in Schedule 1; Defendant/injunction Respondent: Nicholas Spence; Defendant/injunction Respondent: Derek Kewley; Defendant/injunction Respondent: Andrew Crump; Defendant/respondent: Emerging Property Investments Limited (in liquidation); Defendant: Emerging Property Limited; Defendant/respondent: Green Park Holdings (Ilfracombe) Limited; Defendant/respondent: Green Park (Holdings) Limited (in administration); Defendant: GP Ilfracombe Management Company Ltd; Defendant: Green Parks (Westward Ho!) Management Company Limited; Defendant: Alpha Properties (Bradford) Limited; Defendant: A1 Properties (Sunderland) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Application for Interim Relief / Ex Parte Application for Worldwide Freezing Order and Ancillary Relief
- Outcome
- Worldwide freezing order and ancillary relief granted against first, second, and third defendants; permission to enforce in Florida granted; applications against fourth and seventh defendants refused at this stage.
- Legal Topics
- Freezing Injunctions, Deceit, Unlawful Means Conspiracy, Asset Dissipation, Jurisdiction, Service Out of the Jurisdiction, Misrepresentation, Rescission
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Claimants listed in Schedule 1
Claimants/applicants
Nicholas Spence
Defendant/injunction Respondent
Derek Kewley
Defendant/injunction Respondent
Andrew Crump
Defendant/injunction Respondent
Emerging Property Investments Limited (in liquidation)
Defendant/respondent
Emerging Property Limited
Defendant
Green Park Holdings (Ilfracombe) Limited
Defendant/respondent
Green Park (Holdings) Limited (in administration)
Defendant/respondent
GP Ilfracombe Management Company Ltd
Defendant
Green Parks (Westward Ho!) Management Company Limited
Defendant
Alpha Properties (Bradford) Limited
Defendant
A1 Properties (Sunderland) Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Application for Interim Relief / Ex Parte Application for Worldwide Freezing Order and Ancillary Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimants have a good arguable case in deceit and conspiracy
- 2 Whether there is a real risk of dissipation of assets justifying a worldwide freezing order
- 3 Whether it is just and convenient to grant the relief sought
Ratio Decidendi
The claimants established a good arguable case in deceit and conspiracy, a real risk of dissipation of assets by the first, second, and third defendants, and that it is just and convenient to grant a worldwide freezing order and ancillary relief. The requirements for service out of the jurisdiction and enforcement in Florida are satisfied.
Court Disposition
Worldwide freezing order and ancillary relief granted against first, second, and third defendants; permission to enforce in Florida granted; applications against fourth and seventh defendants refused at this stage.
Orders
- Worldwide freezing order against first, second, and third defendants
- Supporting disclosure orders against injunction respondents
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment