Curo Places Ltd v Ingram [2025] EWCC 26 (28 May 2025)
The defendant was found to have breached the injunction order on several occasions, justifying the imposition of a fine and costs as punishment for contempt of court.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCC 26
- Parties
- Claimant: Curo Places Limited; Defendant: Emma Ingram
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt of Court Proceedings / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Defendant found in contempt of court and sentenced to a fine and costs.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Injunction, Sentencing for Contempt
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Curo Places Limited
Claimant
Emma Ingram
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Contempt of Court Proceedings / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant breached the terms of the injunction order dated 6 January 2025
- 2 Appropriate sanction for contempt of court
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant was found to have breached the injunction order on several occasions, justifying the imposition of a fine and costs as punishment for contempt of court.
Court Disposition
Defendant found in contempt of court and sentenced to a fine and costs.
Orders
- Defendant to pay a fine of £100
- Defendant to pay costs of £313
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Neutral Citation Number: [2025] EWCC 26 In the County Court at Bath 28 May 2025 B e f o r e : District Judge Byass ____________________ Between: Curo Places Limited (Claimant) - and - Emma Ingram (Defendant) ____________________ ____________________ HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT ____________________ Crown Copyright © On 28 May 2025, District Judge Byass sitting in the County Court at Bath as a District Judge of the County Court, sentenced the Defendant EMMA INGRAM in that case, to a fine of £100 plus costs of £313 payable at a sum of £20 per fortnight for contempt of Court on breach of an Injunction Order dated 6 January 2025 (made final on 28 January 2025). The basis of the sentence imposed is that EMMA INGRAM was in breach of the Injunction dated 6 January 2025, by On 17 January 2025 attending St Anne's Avenue Keynsham, Bristol BS31 2EH and attempting to communicate with a resident identified within the injunction; On 9 March 2025 attending St Anne's Avenue and attempting to speak to two residents identified within the injunction; On 18 March 2025 coming in and out of a flat on St Anne's Avenue, Keynsham, Bristol BS31 2EH with a baseball bat; On 18 March 2025 the Defendant was found to be within a flat at St Anne's Avenue Keynsham, Bristol BS31 2EH; On 25 March 2025 a video was produced to the Claimant by Avon & Somerset Police which showed the Defendant outside a flat on St Anne's Avenue Keynsham, Bristol BS31 2EH and inside a flat on St Anne's Avenue Keynsham, Bristol BS31 2EH on 7 March 2025. These breaches were contrary to the terms of the Injunction Order dated 6 January 2025 to which the Defendant EMMA INGRAM was subject. BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII