National Navigation Co v Endesa Generacion SA
A judgment of a fellow EU Member State court, given in proceedings falling within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001, including a decision on the incorporation of an arbitration clause as a preliminary issue, must be recognised by English courts under Article 33, even in arbitration-related proceedings...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Respondent: National Navigation Co; Appellant: Endesa Generacion SA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Arbitration proceedings dismissed; Commercial Court action struck out; Permission to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, Issue Estoppel, Arbitration Clause Incorporation, Jurisdiction Under Council Regulation (ec) 44/2001, Public Policy Exception
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Navigation Co
Respondent
Endesa Generacion SA
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a Spanish court judgment refusing to stay proceedings for arbitration is binding on English courts under Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001
- 2 Whether the Spanish judgment creates an issue estoppel regarding the incorporation of an arbitration clause
- 3 Whether English courts must recognise and enforce the Spanish judgment in arbitration-related proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
A judgment of a fellow EU Member State court, given in proceedings falling within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001, including a decision on the incorporation of an arbitration clause as a preliminary issue, must be recognised by English courts under Article 33, even in arbitration-related proceedings excluded from the Regulation. The Spanish court's judgment that no arbitration clause was incorporated is binding and gives rise to issue estoppel, precluding the English court from deciding otherwise. Public policy and the New York Convention do not justify refusal of recognition.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Arbitration proceedings dismissed; Commercial Court action struck out; Permission to appeal refused.
Orders
- Arbitration proceedings (Folio 667) dismissed.
- Commercial Court action (Folio 64) struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment