HSBC Bank Plc v Brophy [2011] EWCA Civ 67 (02 February 2011)

HSBC Bank Plc v Brophy [2011] EWCA Civ 67 (02 February 2011)

The agreement was enforceable because the application form, once countersigned by the bank, constituted an executed agreement containing the prescribed terms, including a valid provision for the credit limit as required by the regulations.

Citation
[2011] EWCA Civ 67
Parties
Claimant/respondent: HSBC Bank Plc; Defendant/appellant: Patrick Brophy
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
02 February 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Enforceability of Credit Agreements, Consumer Credit Act 1974, Prescribed Terms in Credit Agreements, Credit Limit Determination

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

HSBC Bank Plc

Claimant/respondent

Patrick Brophy

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the credit card agreement satisfied the requirements of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and associated regulations
  2. 2 Whether the agreement was void under section 59 of the Act as an agreement to enter into a prospective regulated agreement
  3. 3 Whether the agreement contained the prescribed terms regarding the credit limit as required by regulation 6 and schedule 6 of the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983

Ratio Decidendi

The agreement was enforceable because the application form, once countersigned by the bank, constituted an executed agreement containing the prescribed terms, including a valid provision for the credit limit as required by the regulations.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; judgment for HSBC Bank Plc stands