Jones v Environcom Ltd & Anor [2009] EWHC 16 (Comm) (16 January 2009)
The counterclaim in this case has independent vitality as it is a substantive claim for indemnity and damages, not merely a defence; it is just to order security for the costs of the counterclaim, including costs common to both claim and counterclaim, as either party could have been claimant and the substance of the dispute is the defendants' claim for indemnity.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 16 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Nicholas G Jones (on his own behalf and on behalf of all underwriting members of the Lloyd's Syndicates referred to in Schedule 1 hereto subscribing to Policy No. WBCUL/07 70695 and on behalf of all underwriting members of the Lloyd's Syndicate 1200 subscribing to Policy No. WBCUL/07 70695 and Policy No. WBHER/05 70108); Defendant: Environcom Limited; Defendant: Environcom England Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Insurance Dispute / Preliminary Issues Determination on Application for Security for Costs of Counterclaim
- Outcome
- Preliminary issues determined in favour of the claimant insurers; security for costs may be ordered for the full amount of the counterclaim costs.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Counterclaims, Non Disclosure in Insurance, Costs Allocation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicholas G Jones (on his own behalf and on behalf of all underwriting members of the Lloyd's Syndicates referred to in Schedule 1 hereto subscribing to Policy No. WBCUL/07 70695 and on behalf of all underwriting members of the Lloyd's Syndicate 1200 subscribing to Policy No. WBCUL/07 70695 and Policy No. WBHER/05 70108)
Claimant
Environcom Limited
Defendant
Environcom England Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Insurance Dispute / Preliminary Issues Determination on Application for Security for Costs of Counterclaim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants' counterclaim has independent vitality justifying an order for security for costs
- 2 Whether security for costs should cover only costs exclusively referable to the counterclaim or also common costs
Ratio Decidendi
The counterclaim in this case has independent vitality as it is a substantive claim for indemnity and damages, not merely a defence; it is just to order security for the costs of the counterclaim, including costs common to both claim and counterclaim, as either party could have been claimant and the substance of the dispute is the defendants' claim for indemnity.
Court Disposition
Preliminary issues determined in favour of the claimant insurers; security for costs may be ordered for the full amount of the counterclaim costs.
Orders
- Court will hear argument as to costs and consequential orders after formal hand down of judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment