Revenue & Customs v Epson Telford Ltd
The court found that, due to disagreement between the tribunal and the judge, diversity of treatment in the EU, and absence of argument from the respondent, it is appropriate to adjourn the application to a full court for further consideration with both parties present.
- Parties
- Respondent: Commissioners of HM Revenue & Customs; Appellant: Epson Telford Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application adjourned to a full court
- Legal Topics
- Customs Tariff Classification, Combined Nomenclature, Judicial Review, Reference to European Court of Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commissioners of HM Revenue & Customs
Respondent
Epson Telford Ltd
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether second and third generation Epson inkjet printer cartridges should be classified as 'ink' or as 'parts suitable for use with printers' under the Combined Nomenclature
- 2 Whether there is sufficient doubt to warrant a reference to the European Court of Justice
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, due to disagreement between the tribunal and the judge, diversity of treatment in the EU, and absence of argument from the respondent, it is appropriate to adjourn the application to a full court for further consideration with both parties present.
Court Disposition
Application adjourned to a full court
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal adjourned to a full court to be heard on notice, with the appeal to follow immediately if permission is granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment