Navalmar UK Ltd v Ergo Versicherung AG & Anor (BSLE SUNRISE) [2019] EWHC 2860 (Comm) (04 November 2019)

Navalmar UK Ltd v Ergo Versicherung AG & Anor (BSLE SUNRISE) [2019] EWHC 2860 (Comm) (04 November 2019)

Defendants are entitled to raise a Rule D defence under York-Antwerp Rules as a defence to liability under General Average Guarantees; nothing is payable under the guarantees if the loss was caused by owner's actionable default or until that issue is resolved.

Citation
[2019] EWHC 2860 (Comm)
Parties
Claimant: Navalmar UK Limited; Defendant: Ergo Versicherung AG; Defendant: Chubb European SE
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 November 2019
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Preliminary Issue / Trial of Preliminary Issue
Outcome
Preliminary issue resolved in favour of defendants; owner cannot recover under GA guarantees if Rule D defence is available.
Legal Topics
General Average Guarantees, York Antwerp Rules, Rule D Defence, Contract Construction, Cargo Insurance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 8 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Navalmar UK Limited

Claimant

Ergo Versicherung AG

Defendant

Chubb European SE

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Court Preliminary Issue / Trial of Preliminary Issue

  1. 1 Whether defendants can raise a Rule D defence under York-Antwerp Rules as a defence to liability under General Average Guarantees

Ratio Decidendi

Defendants are entitled to raise a Rule D defence under York-Antwerp Rules as a defence to liability under General Average Guarantees; nothing is payable under the guarantees if the loss was caused by owner's actionable default or until that issue is resolved.

Court Disposition

Preliminary issue resolved in favour of defendants; owner cannot recover under GA guarantees if Rule D defence is available.

Orders

  • Claim against defendants under GA guarantees dismissed pending resolution of Rule D defence.