Moss v The Crown
The Recorder's findings were flawed as he failed to make the necessary findings that the Appellant had benefited to the extent of not less than £5,000 from the conduct constituting the offences charged, relied improperly on the Appellant's intention, and did not properly analyse the temporal and causal connection between the offences and the alleged benefit. The confiscation and costs orders were therefore quashed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Eric John Moss; Respondent: The Crown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence (confiscation and Costs Order)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; confiscation and costs orders quashed.
- Legal Topics
- Confiscation Orders, Criminal Lifestyle, Benefit From Criminal Conduct, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eric John Moss
Appellant
The Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence (confiscation and Costs Order)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Recorder was wrong to find that the Appellant had benefited from the offences to which he pleaded guilty and so had no power to make a confiscation order
- 2 Whether the confiscation order was disproportionate or unfair
Ratio Decidendi
The Recorder's findings were flawed as he failed to make the necessary findings that the Appellant had benefited to the extent of not less than £5,000 from the conduct constituting the offences charged, relied improperly on the Appellant's intention, and did not properly analyse the temporal and causal connection between the offences and the alleged benefit. The confiscation and costs orders were therefore quashed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; confiscation and costs orders quashed.
Orders
- Confiscation order quashed
- Costs order in the sum of £8,000 quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment