Glenn v Watson & Ors [2018] EWHC 2016 (Ch) (31 July 2018)
The court found that Mr Watson owed and breached fiduciary duties to the claimants in relation to the joint ventures, particularly by securing undisclosed personal benefits and engaging in deliberate deception. The Project Spartan agreements were procured by deceit and/or breach of duty, entitling the claimants to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] EWHC 2016 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Sir Owen George Glenn KNZM ONZM; Claimant: Kea Investments Limited; Defendant: Eric John Watson; Defendant: Novatrust Limited; Defendant: Miles John Anthony Leahy; Defendant: Nucopia Partners Limited; Defendant: Spartan Capital Limited; Defendant: Munil Development Inc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Chancery Division Commercial Claim / Post Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimants against the remaining defendants (excluding those settled).
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Knowing Receipt, Equitable Compensation, Damages for Deceit, Trust Administration, Joint Venture Disputes
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sir Owen George Glenn KNZM ONZM
Claimant
Kea Investments Limited
Claimant
Eric John Watson
Defendant
Novatrust Limited
Defendant
Miles John Anthony Leahy
Defendant
Nucopia Partners Limited
Defendant
Spartan Capital Limited
Defendant
Munil Development Inc
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Commercial Claim / Post Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Watson owed and breached fiduciary duties to the claimants
- 2 Whether Mr Dickson breached his duty as director of Kea
- 3 Whether the Project Spartan agreements should be set aside for deceit or breach of duty
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Mr Watson owed and breached fiduciary duties to the claimants in relation to the joint ventures, particularly by securing undisclosed personal benefits and engaging in deliberate deception. The Project Spartan agreements were procured by deceit and/or breach of duty, entitling the claimants to set aside the agreements and claim equitable compensation and damages. The evidence of the main witnesses for the defendants was found unreliable or self-serving, and the claimants' proprietary and personal claims were established on the facts.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimants against the remaining defendants (excluding those settled).
Orders
- Project Spartan agreements set aside as against the remaining defendants.
- Defendants to pay equitable compensation and damages for deceit to the claimants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment