Glenn v Watson & Ors
The July 2012 agreements and subsequent agreements between Kea and Spartan are voidable and set aside for fraudulent misrepresentation, inducement (secret commission), and breach of fiduciary duty by Mr Watson to Kea. Mr Watson and associates orchestrated a scheme to mislead Kea as to the destination of substantial payments, failed to disclose personal interests, and offered inducements to Kea’s agents. The Claimants are entitled to restitution, tracing, and equitable compensation. Affirmation and ratification defences fail as Claimants lacked full knowledge of the fraud.
- Parties
- Claimant: Sir Owen George Glenn KNZM ONZM; Claimant: Kea Investments Limited; Defendant: Eric John Watson; Defendant: Novatrust Limited; Defendant: Miles John Anthony Leahy; Defendant: Nucopia Partners Limited; Defendant: Spartan Capital Limited; Defendant: Munil Development Inc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (commercial/chancery) / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim for rescission and restitution succeeds; July 2012 and subsequent agreements set aside as against remaining Defendants; Claimants entitled to restitution, tracing, and equitable compensation; damages for deceit not awarded due to pleading/amendment issues.
- Legal Topics
- Fiduciary Duties, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Knowing Receipt, Breach of Trust, Joint Venture Disputes, Restitution, Equitable Compensation, Bribery/secret Commissions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sir Owen George Glenn KNZM ONZM
Claimant
Kea Investments Limited
Claimant
Eric John Watson
Defendant
Novatrust Limited
Defendant
Miles John Anthony Leahy
Defendant
Nucopia Partners Limited
Defendant
Spartan Capital Limited
Defendant
Munil Development Inc
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (commercial/chancery) / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Watson owed fiduciary duties to Sir Owen or Kea in relation to Project Edsel and Project Spartan
- 2 Whether the July 2012 agreements (and subsequent agreements) are voidable or void for deceit, inducement, breach of fiduciary duty, or want of authority
- 3 Whether Mr Watson and associates made fraudulent misrepresentations to induce Kea’s investment
Ratio Decidendi
The July 2012 agreements and subsequent agreements between Kea and Spartan are voidable and set aside for fraudulent misrepresentation, inducement (secret commission), and breach of fiduciary duty by Mr Watson to Kea. Mr Watson and associates orchestrated a scheme to mislead Kea as to the destination of substantial payments, failed to disclose personal interests, and offered inducements to Kea’s agents. The Claimants are entitled to restitution, tracing, and equitable compensation. Affirmation and ratification defences fail as Claimants lacked full knowledge of the fraud.
Court Disposition
Claim for rescission and restitution succeeds; July 2012 and subsequent agreements set aside as against remaining Defendants; Claimants entitled to restitution, tracing, and equitable compensation; damages for deceit not awarded due to pleading/amendment issues.
Orders
- July 2012 and subsequent agreements between Kea and Spartan set aside as against remaining Defendants
- Claimants entitled to restitution of sums paid under set aside agreements
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment