John Doyle Construction Ltd v Erith Contractors Ltd (Rev 1) [2020] EWHC 2451 (TCC) (14 September 2020)

John Doyle Construction Ltd v Erith Contractors Ltd (Rev 1) [2020] EWHC 2451 (TCC) (14 September 2020)

A company in liquidation may obtain summary judgment to enforce an adjudicator's decision only if adequate safeguards are in place to protect the respondent's right to repayment in the event of a successful cross-claim or final determination. In this case, the court found that the arrangements between JDC and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] EWHC 2451 (TCC)
Parties
Claimant: John Doyle Construction Limited (in liquidation); Defendant: Erith Contractors Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 September 2020
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application (cpr Part 7) for Enforcement of Adjudicator's Decision / High Court (technology and Construction Court) Judgment on Summary Judgment Application
Outcome
Summary judgment granted for the claimant, with a stay of execution pending provision of security.
Legal Topics
Adjudication Enforcement, Companies in Liquidation, Damages Based Agreements, Insolvency Set Off, Summary Judgment, Stay of Execution
Construction Law Insolvency Law Civil Procedure Adjudication Enforcement Companies in Liquidation Damages Based Agreements Insolvency Set Off Summary Judgment +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Doyle Construction Limited (in liquidation)

Claimant

Erith Contractors Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Summary Judgment Application (cpr Part 7) for Enforcement of Adjudicator's Decision / High Court (technology and Construction Court) Judgment on Summary Judgment Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a company in liquidation is entitled to summary judgment to enforce an adjudicator's decision in its favour
  2. 2 Whether the arrangement between the liquidators and Henderson & Jones is contrary to the Damages Based Agreements Regulations 2013
  3. 3 Whether a stay of execution should be granted if summary judgment is ordered

Ratio Decidendi

A company in liquidation may obtain summary judgment to enforce an adjudicator's decision only if adequate safeguards are in place to protect the respondent's right to repayment in the event of a successful cross-claim or final determination. In this case, the court found that the arrangements between JDC and Henderson & Jones did not contravene the Damages Based Agreements Regulations 2013, and that the security offered by JDC (letter of credit and ATE insurance) was sufficient to protect Erith's interests. Therefore, summary judgment was granted, but a stay of execution was imposed pending provision of the security.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment granted for the claimant, with a stay of execution pending provision of security.

Orders

  • Summary judgment in favour of John Doyle Construction Limited for the sum awarded by the adjudicator (approximately £1.2 million including VAT and interest)
  • Stay of execution of the judgment until satisfactory security (letter of credit and ATE insurance) is provided to Erith Contractors Limited