Xhaferi, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 1039 (16 August 2024)
The sentencing judge erred in positioning the case within the guideline range by failing to give appropriate weight to significant mitigating features and by giving undue weight to aggravating factors not supported by evidence; the sentence was manifestly excessive and should be reduced to reflect the appellant's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] EWCA Crim 1039
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Erjon Xhaferi
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; sentence reduced
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Production of Controlled Drugs, Mitigation, Aggravating Factors
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Erjon Xhaferi
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for production of a controlled drug was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge gave adequate weight to mitigation and correctly applied the Sentencing Council guidelines
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge erred in positioning the case within the guideline range by failing to give appropriate weight to significant mitigating features and by giving undue weight to aggravating factors not supported by evidence; the sentence was manifestly excessive and should be reduced to reflect the appellant's role and personal mitigation.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; sentence reduced
Orders
- Sentence of 22 months' imprisonment quashed and substituted with a sentence of 16 months' imprisonment for the production offence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment