R v Errol Campbell

R v Errol Campbell

The conviction is unsafe due to fresh evidence of dishonesty and criminality by key police witnesses, whose testimony was central to the prosecution case; the appeal is allowed and the conviction quashed.

Parties
Appellant: Errol Campbell; Respondent: Rex
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 March 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
appeal allowed; conviction quashed
Legal Topics
Miscarriage of Justice, Fresh Evidence, Racial Prejudice, Dishonesty of Police, Unsafe Conviction
Criminal Law Miscarriage of Justice Fresh Evidence Racial Prejudice Dishonesty of Police Unsafe Conviction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Errol Campbell

Appellant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether fresh evidence of police dishonesty renders the conviction unsafe
  2. 2 Whether racial prejudice affected the integrity of the prosecution
  3. 3 Whether the conviction should be quashed due to unreliable police testimony

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction is unsafe due to fresh evidence of dishonesty and criminality by key police witnesses, whose testimony was central to the prosecution case; the appeal is allowed and the conviction quashed.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed; conviction quashed

Orders

  • Conviction of Errol Campbell quashed
  • No application for retrial