Nabavi & Anor v Guild [2002] EWCA Civ 316 (14 March 2002)
The Court of Appeal held that the judge erred in attributing originality in the designs solely to Mrs Guild, as the key design features were either collaborative or not sufficiently original. The garments produced by Mr Nabavi were not shown to be copies of original designs by Mrs Guild, and the differences in...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 316
- Parties
- Appellant: Eskandar Nabavi; Appellant: Eskandar Limited; Respondent: Shirin Guild
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; claim for design right infringement dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Design Right, Copyright, Originality, Infringement, Groundless Threats
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eskandar Nabavi
Appellant
Eskandar Limited
Appellant
Shirin Guild
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mrs Guild's designs were original and entitled to design right protection
- 2 Whether Mr Nabavi copied the designs and infringed design right
- 3 Whether the garments produced by Mr Nabavi were made substantially to Mrs Guild's designs
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that the judge erred in attributing originality in the designs solely to Mrs Guild, as the key design features were either collaborative or not sufficiently original. The garments produced by Mr Nabavi were not shown to be copies of original designs by Mrs Guild, and the differences in dimensions and features were significant. Therefore, the claim for design right infringement failed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; claim for design right infringement dismissed
Orders
- Mrs Guild's claim for design right infringement is dismissed
- No injunction or damages awarded against Mr Nabavi
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment