The Argo Fund Ltd. v Essar Steel Ltd.

The Argo Fund Ltd. v Essar Steel Ltd.

Argo Fund Limited is not a qualifying transferee under the loan agreement as it is not a bank or institution of like kind; therefore, the claimant has not established a good arguable case for summary judgment, and the English court lacks jurisdiction based on the contractual service mechanism.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Claimant: The Argo Fund Limited; Defendant: Essar Steel Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 January 2004
Procedural Posture
Commercial / Summary Judgment Application and Jurisdictional Challenge
Outcome
Summary judgment application dismissed; jurisdictional challenge upheld; extension of time to challenge jurisdiction refused; stay pending Singapore proceedings refused.
Legal Topics
Loan Agreement, Transfer of Rights, Jurisdiction, Summary Judgment
Contract Law Banking Law Loan Agreement Transfer of Rights Jurisdiction Summary Judgment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Argo Fund Limited

Claimant

Essar Steel Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial / Summary Judgment Application and Jurisdictional Challenge

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Argo Fund Limited is a qualifying transferee under the loan agreement
  2. 2 Whether the English court has jurisdiction based on service of process
  3. 3 Whether time for challenging jurisdiction should be extended

Ratio Decidendi

Argo Fund Limited is not a qualifying transferee under the loan agreement as it is not a bank or institution of like kind; therefore, the claimant has not established a good arguable case for summary judgment, and the English court lacks jurisdiction based on the contractual service mechanism.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment application dismissed; jurisdictional challenge upheld; extension of time to challenge jurisdiction refused; stay pending Singapore proceedings refused.

Orders

  • Claimant's application for summary judgment dismissed.
  • Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the claim.