Cazton International Limited & Ors v Essity Aktiebolag (Publ) & Anor
The claimants have a real prospect of establishing beneficial ownership and sufficient interest to seek declaratory relief regarding an event of default and acceleration notices, despite not being parties to the contract or having direct legal rights under the notes. The absence of custodians and clearing systems as parties does not preclude the claim proceeding, as all relevant arguments can be presented and the declarations sought may serve a useful purpose.
- Parties
- Claimant: Caxton International Limited; Claimant: OCM Luxembourg VOF SARL; Claimant: Boston Patriot Arlington St LLC; Claimant: Northlight European Fundamental Credit Master Fund; Claimant: MFM Northlight European Credit Opportunities; Claimant: Sona Credit Master Fund Limited; Claimant: Sona Blue Peak Ltd; Claimant: Sparta Global Opportunities Master Fund LP; Defendant: Essity Aktiebolag (Publ); Defendant: Essity Capital B.V.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application to Set Aside Permission to Serve Out of Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Application to set aside permission to serve out of jurisdiction dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Declaratory Relief, Standing of Beneficial Owners, Intermediated Securities, Event of Default, Acceleration Notices
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Caxton International Limited
Claimant
OCM Luxembourg VOF SARL
Claimant
Boston Patriot Arlington St LLC
Claimant
Northlight European Fundamental Credit Master Fund
Claimant
MFM Northlight European Credit Opportunities
Claimant
Sona Credit Master Fund Limited
Claimant
Sona Blue Peak Ltd
Claimant
Sparta Global Opportunities Master Fund LP
Claimant
Essity Aktiebolag (Publ)
Defendant
Essity Capital B.V.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application to Set Aside Permission to Serve Out of Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether ultimate beneficial owners of loan notes have standing to seek declaratory relief against the issuer regarding an event of default
- 2 Whether declaratory relief can be granted when the claimants are not parties to the contract and lack direct legal rights under the notes
- 3 Whether granting declarations would serve a useful purpose in the absence of custodians and clearing systems as parties
Ratio Decidendi
The claimants have a real prospect of establishing beneficial ownership and sufficient interest to seek declaratory relief regarding an event of default and acceleration notices, despite not being parties to the contract or having direct legal rights under the notes. The absence of custodians and clearing systems as parties does not preclude the claim proceeding, as all relevant arguments can be presented and the declarations sought may serve a useful purpose.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside permission to serve out of jurisdiction dismissed
Orders
- Permission to serve out of jurisdiction remains in force
- Claim proceeds to trial on substantive issues
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment