R v Ethan Burdett

R v Ethan Burdett

The original sentence was manifestly excessive as it far exceeded the aggregate starting points for the offences charged, violating the totality principle. The appropriate sentence before reduction for guilty plea was two years' imprisonment, reduced to 18 months for the guilty plea.

Parties
Appellant: Ethan Burdett; Respondent: Rex (The Crown)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 April 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal allowed in part; sentence reduced
Legal Topics
Causing Death by Careless Driving, Sentencing Guidelines, Totality Principle, Mitigating and Aggravating Factors

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ethan Burdett

Appellant

Rex (The Crown)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed for causing death by careless driving was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether the judge properly applied the sentencing guidelines and totality principle
  3. 3 Whether mitigating factors were adequately considered

Ratio Decidendi

The original sentence was manifestly excessive as it far exceeded the aggregate starting points for the offences charged, violating the totality principle. The appropriate sentence before reduction for guilty plea was two years' imprisonment, reduced to 18 months for the guilty plea.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed in part; sentence reduced

Orders

  • Sentences of three years' imprisonment quashed and substituted with concurrent sentences of 18 months' imprisonment.
  • Driving disqualification reduced to three years plus an extension period of nine months (total 45 months).