EU Plants Ltd v Wokingham Borough Council [2012] EWHC 3305 (Admin) (22 November 2012)
The Planning Committee's decision to confirm the Tree Preservation Order was lawful, rational, and within the scope of statutory and policy guidance; there was no evidence of actual or apparent bias, and the applicant's challenge failed on all grounds.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] EWHC 3305 (Admin)
- Parties
- Applicant: EU Plants Ltd; Respondent: Wokingham Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Statutory Application Under Section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / Judgment Following Oral Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Tree Preservation Orders, Bias in Decision Making, Amenity Assessment, Expediency, Natural Justice
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
EU Plants Ltd
Applicant
Wokingham Borough Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Statutory Application Under Section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / Judgment Following Oral Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tree Preservation Order was expedient in the interests of amenity
- 2 Whether the Council misapplied statutory and policy criteria
- 3 Whether the Planning Committee's decision was irrational or unreasonable
Ratio Decidendi
The Planning Committee's decision to confirm the Tree Preservation Order was lawful, rational, and within the scope of statutory and policy guidance; there was no evidence of actual or apparent bias, and the applicant's challenge failed on all grounds.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Tree Preservation Order confirmed
- No relief granted to applicant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment