Canary Wharf (Bp4) T1 Ltd & Ors v European Medicines Agency
Given the nature of the expert reports as narrative and collation of documents, and the court's earlier ruling that opinion evidence would not assist, cross-examination of the experts is neither necessary nor appropriate. The judge can assimilate the material and reach a conclusion without further expert opinion.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Canary Wharf (BP4) T1 Limited; Claimant: Canary Wharf (CP4) T2 Limited; Claimant: Canary Wharf Management Limited; Defendant: European Medicines Agency
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Expert Evidence, Trial Management, Foreseeability, Brexit Implications
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Canary Wharf (BP4) T1 Limited
Claimant
Canary Wharf (CP4) T2 Limited
Claimant
Canary Wharf Management Limited
Claimant
European Medicines Agency
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether expert witnesses should be cross-examined regarding the foreseeability of Brexit at the time the lease was concluded
Ratio Decidendi
Given the nature of the expert reports as narrative and collation of documents, and the court's earlier ruling that opinion evidence would not assist, cross-examination of the experts is neither necessary nor appropriate. The judge can assimilate the material and reach a conclusion without further expert opinion.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The two expert reports shall stand as narratives only.
- No cross-examination of the experts shall take place.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment