Onecom Group Limited & Anor v Eve Connect Ltd & Ors
The court lacks jurisdiction under CPR 3.1(2)(p) to order a party to provide a corrective witness statement explaining how errors occurred or were discovered, as no case management purpose or overriding objective justifies such an order once the duty to correct false evidence has been fulfilled.
- Parties
- Claimant: Onecom Group Limited; Claimant: Onecom Partners Limited; Defendant: Eve Connect Ltd; Defendant: KM Telecom Ltd; Defendant: Mr. James Palmer; Defendant: Mr. Kevin Mitchell
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Litigation / Ruling on Application for Corrective Witness Statement
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Case Management Powers, Litigation Privilege, Corrective Evidence, Duty of Full and Frank Disclosure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Onecom Group Limited
Claimant
Onecom Partners Limited
Claimant
Eve Connect Ltd
Defendant
KM Telecom Ltd
Defendant
Mr. James Palmer
Defendant
Mr. Kevin Mitchell
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Litigation / Ruling on Application for Corrective Witness Statement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to order a corrective witness statement explaining errors and their discovery
- 2 Scope of duty to correct false evidence
- 3 Case management purpose under CPR 3.1(2)(p)
Ratio Decidendi
The court lacks jurisdiction under CPR 3.1(2)(p) to order a party to provide a corrective witness statement explaining how errors occurred or were discovered, as no case management purpose or overriding objective justifies such an order once the duty to correct false evidence has been fulfilled.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment