Keydon Estates Ltd v Eversheds LLP [2005] EWHC 972 (Ch) (20 May 2005)
The diminution in value rule is not of universal application in solicitor's negligence cases. Where the solicitor knew the purpose of the transaction was to secure an income stream, and evidence shows that alternative investments were available, damages should be assessed by reference to the loss of the alternative income stream Keydon would have obtained, discounted to avoid overcompensation. The appropriate assessment date is the date of judgment, and damages are the difference between the likely result of an alternative investment and what actually transpired.
- Citation
- [2005] EWHC 972 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Keydon Estates Limited; Defendant: Eversheds LLP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Claim for Damages for Professional Negligence/breach of Contract / Judgment After Trial on Measure of Damages
- Outcome
- Claimant's claim for damages broadly succeeds. Damages awarded on the alternative investment loss basis, subject to inquiry on the loss of repairing covenant and deduction for car park income.
- Legal Topics
- Measure of Damages, Solicitor's Duty of Care, Loss Assessment, Diminution in Value Rule, Alternative Investment Loss, Breach of Contract, Negligent Advice, Causation of Loss
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Keydon Estates Limited
Claimant
Eversheds LLP
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Claim for Damages for Professional Negligence/breach of Contract / Judgment After Trial on Measure of Damages
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the proper measure of damages recoverable by Keydon for Eversheds' admitted negligence in advising on the purchase of the Property?
- 2 Should damages be assessed by the diminution in value rule or by reference to loss of alternative investment income?
Ratio Decidendi
The diminution in value rule is not of universal application in solicitor's negligence cases. Where the solicitor knew the purpose of the transaction was to secure an income stream, and evidence shows that alternative investments were available, damages should be assessed by reference to the loss of the alternative income stream Keydon would have obtained, discounted to avoid overcompensation. The appropriate assessment date is the date of judgment, and damages are the difference between the likely result of an alternative investment and what actually transpired.
Court Disposition
Claimant's claim for damages broadly succeeds. Damages awarded on the alternative investment loss basis, subject to inquiry on the loss of repairing covenant and deduction for car park income.
Orders
- Damages to date assessed at £310,294.31, subject to inquiry as to damages for loss of repairing covenant.
- Deduction of £900 for car park income received.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment