Arqiva Ltd & Ors v Everything Everywhere Ltd & Ors
The agreements between Arqiva and the Defendants do not permit EE and OPCS to implement 2G/3G roaming and network consolidation where such arrangements amount to further consolidation or sharing with another licensed operator, assignment, or sub-licensing, without Arqiva's consent. The implementation of roaming by...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Arqiva Limited; Claimant: Arqiva Service Limited; Claimant: Arqiva No 2 Limited; Claimant: Arqiva No 3 Limited; Claimant: Arqiva Arial Sites PLC; Defendant: Everything Everywhere Limited; Defendant: Orange Personal Communications Service Limited; Defendant: Orange Holdings (UK) Limited; Defendant: Mobile Broadband Network Limited; Defendant: Hutchinson 3G (UK) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial/contractual Dispute / Expedited Trial—judgment on Liability and Entitlement to Relief; Quantum and Final Orders Reserved
- Outcome
- Liability judgment for Arqiva on breach of contract; form of relief and quantum reserved for further submissions
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Telecommunications Site Agreements, Roaming Rights and Network Consolidation, Assignment and Sub Licensing of Contractual Rights, Breach of Contract, Remedies—injunctions and Damages, Spectrum Licence Transfer Validity
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Arqiva Limited
Claimant
Arqiva Service Limited
Claimant
Arqiva No 2 Limited
Claimant
Arqiva No 3 Limited
Claimant
Arqiva Arial Sites PLC
Claimant
Everything Everywhere Limited
Defendant
Orange Personal Communications Service Limited
Defendant
Orange Holdings (UK) Limited
Defendant
Mobile Broadband Network Limited
Defendant
Hutchinson 3G (UK) Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial/contractual Dispute / Expedited Trial—judgment on Liability and Entitlement to Relief; Quantum and Final Orders Reserved
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the agreements between Arqiva and the Defendants permit or prohibit the implementation of 2G/3G roaming and network consolidation between EE and OPCS
- 2 Whether OPCS remains a spectrum licence holder or if the transfer to EE was valid under the Wireless Telegraphy Act 2006
- 3 Whether the Defendants' actions constitute breaches of the relevant agreements and/or trespass
Ratio Decidendi
The agreements between Arqiva and the Defendants do not permit EE and OPCS to implement 2G/3G roaming and network consolidation where such arrangements amount to further consolidation or sharing with another licensed operator, assignment, or sub-licensing, without Arqiva's consent. The implementation of roaming by EE for OPCS customers (and vice versa) constitutes a breach of the relevant agreements up to 2 March 2011, when OPCS was still a licensed operator. The validity of the spectrum licence transfer from OPCS to EE is not determined in this judgment, as OFCOM was not a party and further submissions are required. The question of injunctive relief and quantum is reserved for further...
Court Disposition
Liability judgment for Arqiva on breach of contract; form of relief and quantum reserved for further submissions
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment