Gagliardi v Evolution Capital Management LLC [2023] EWHC 1608 (Comm) (29 June 2023)
Mr Gagliardi is domiciled in England, habitually worked in London for Evolution, and is an employee for the purposes of s.15C CJJA 1982. He is entitled to be sued only in England and Wales, and the only effective way to protect this right is to grant an anti-suit injunction restraining Evolution from prosecuting the New York proceedings. There are no strong reasons to refuse the injunction.
- Citation
- [2023] EWHC 1608 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Robert Gagliardi; Defendant: Evolution Capital Management LLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Anti Suit Injunction (asi) in Employment Dispute / Interim Application Prior to Combined Hearing of ASI and Jurisdiction Challenge
- Outcome
- Prohibitory anti-suit injunction granted; mandatory injunction refused
- Legal Topics
- Anti Suit Injunctions, Jurisdictional Disputes, Employee Protection Under CJJA 1982, Domicile Determination, Enforcement of Statutory Rights, Comity and Foreign Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Gagliardi
Claimant
Evolution Capital Management LLC
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Anti Suit Injunction (asi) in Employment Dispute / Interim Application Prior to Combined Hearing of ASI and Jurisdiction Challenge
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the English court has personal jurisdiction over Evolution Capital Management LLC under s.15C(2)(b) CJJA 1982
- 2 Whether Mr Gagliardi is domiciled in England for the purposes of s.15C CJJA 1982
- 3 Whether Mr Gagliardi is an employee for the purposes of the Brussels Regulation regime
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Gagliardi is domiciled in England, habitually worked in London for Evolution, and is an employee for the purposes of s.15C CJJA 1982. He is entitled to be sued only in England and Wales, and the only effective way to protect this right is to grant an anti-suit injunction restraining Evolution from prosecuting the New York proceedings. There are no strong reasons to refuse the injunction.
Court Disposition
Prohibitory anti-suit injunction granted; mandatory injunction refused
Orders
- Evolution is restrained from further prosecuting or procuring the prosecution of the New York proceedings prior to the combined hearing of the ASI and jurisdiction challenge.
- Evolution is ordered to co-operate in a joint approach to the New York court to stay or extend the date for Mr Gagliardi to file his Answer.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment