Deepak Fertilisers & Petrochemical Corporation v Davy McKee (London) Ltd & Anor [1998] EWCA Civ 1753 (12 November 1998)
The Court held that the exclusion and indemnity clauses, properly construed, excluded Davy's and ICI's liability for negligence, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of collateral warranty. The letter of acceptance released Davy from contractual obligations, but not from post-acceptance obligations or liabilities arising after the letter. Davy and ICI could not rely on co-insurance or subrogation defences after construction and commissioning were complete, as they no longer had an insurable interest in the plant. Davy was entitled to enforce Deepak's promise to indemnify ICI and to seek a stay of proceedings against ICI to the extent of the indemnity.
- Citation
- [1998] EWCA Civ 1753
- Parties
- Appellant/plaintiff: Deepak Fertilisers and Petrochemical Corporation; Respondent/defendant: Davy McKee (London) Ltd; Respondent/defendant: ICI Chemicals & Polymers Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (commercial Court, Queen's Bench Division)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; cross-appeal dismissed in part; judgment varied.
- Legal Topics
- Exclusion Clauses, Indemnity Clauses, Negligence, Negligent Misrepresentation, Collateral Warranty, Limitation of Liability, Co Insurance, Subrogation, Construction of Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Deepak Fertilisers and Petrochemical Corporation
Appellant/plaintiff
Davy McKee (London) Ltd
Respondent/defendant
ICI Chemicals & Polymers Ltd
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (commercial Court, Queen's Bench Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the letter of acceptance released Davy from all contractual obligations and liabilities under the contract.
- 2 Whether exclusion and indemnity clauses in the contract excluded or limited Davy's and ICI's liability for negligence, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of collateral warranty.
- 3 Whether Davy and ICI could rely on co-insurance and subrogation provisions as a defence to Deepak's claims.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the exclusion and indemnity clauses, properly construed, excluded Davy's and ICI's liability for negligence, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of collateral warranty. The letter of acceptance released Davy from contractual obligations, but not from post-acceptance obligations or liabilities arising after the letter. Davy and ICI could not rely on co-insurance or subrogation defences after construction and commissioning were complete, as they no longer had an insurable interest in the plant. Davy was entitled to enforce Deepak's promise to indemnify ICI and to seek a stay of proceedings against ICI to the extent of the indemnity.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; cross-appeal dismissed in part; judgment varied.
Orders
- Davy and ICI's liability to Deepak for negligence, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of collateral warranty is excluded by the contract.
- Davy is released from contractual obligations by the letter of acceptance, except for post-acceptance obligations.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment