Express Electrical Distributors Ltd v Beavis & Ors [2016] EWCA Civ 765 (19 July 2016)
A validation order under section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986 should not be granted for a payment made after presentation of a winding up petition unless there is credible evidence that the transaction was for the benefit of the general body of unsecured creditors or did not prejudice their interests. In this case, the payment was not in the ordinary course of business, was made in advance of contractual terms, and there was insufficient evidence of benefit to creditors; thus, the court's discretion should not be exercised in favour of validation.
- Citation
- [2016] EWCA Civ 765
- Parties
- Appellant: Express Electrical Distributors Limited; Respondent: Beavis and Ors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Chancery Division, Manchester District Registry
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Validation Orders, Section 127 Insolvency Act 1986, Pari Passu Principle, Retrospective Validation, Creditor Preference
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Express Electrical Distributors Limited
Appellant
Beavis and Ors
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Chancery Division, Manchester District Registry
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a validation order should be granted under section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986 for a payment made by a company after presentation of a winding up petition but before knowledge of the petition by the payee.
- 2 Whether the payment was in the ordinary course of business and/or for the benefit of the general body of unsecured creditors.
Ratio Decidendi
A validation order under section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986 should not be granted for a payment made after presentation of a winding up petition unless there is credible evidence that the transaction was for the benefit of the general body of unsecured creditors or did not prejudice their interests. In this case, the payment was not in the ordinary course of business, was made in advance of contractual terms, and there was insufficient evidence of benefit to creditors; thus, the court's discretion should not be exercised in favour of validation.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No validation order granted under section 127 Insolvency Act 1986 for the £30,000 payment.
- Sum to remain with solicitors for the liquidators pending outcome.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment