White v Express Newspapers [2014] EWHC 657 (QB) (18 March 2014)
The words complained of mean there are reasonable grounds to suspect that Mr Callaghan used insider information from Mr White to place winning bets, and so reasonable grounds to suspect both men acted dishonestly to enable Mr Callaghan to place winning bets. This is a defamatory allegation of fact, but falls short of alleging actual guilt.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 657
- Parties
- Claimant: James White; Claimant: John Callaghan; Defendant: Express Newspapers
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Libel Action / Preliminary Issue on Meaning of Words Complained of
- Outcome
- Determination of meaning as preliminary issue; words found to bear defamatory meaning as set out in judgment.
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Defamatory Meaning, Media Publications, Insider Information, Sports Betting
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James White
Claimant
John Callaghan
Claimant
Express Newspapers
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Libel Action / Preliminary Issue on Meaning of Words Complained of
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the words complained of are capable of bearing the meanings attributed by the claimants
- 2 Whether the words are defamatory of the claimants
- 3 Whether the words allege actual guilt or only suspicion
Ratio Decidendi
The words complained of mean there are reasonable grounds to suspect that Mr Callaghan used insider information from Mr White to place winning bets, and so reasonable grounds to suspect both men acted dishonestly to enable Mr Callaghan to place winning bets. This is a defamatory allegation of fact, but falls short of alleging actual guilt.
Court Disposition
Determination of meaning as preliminary issue; words found to bear defamatory meaning as set out in judgment.
Orders
- The meaning of the words complained of is that there are reasonable grounds to suspect that Mr Callaghan used insider information communicated to him by Mr White to place winning bets, and so reasonable grounds to suspect that both men acted dishonestly to enable Mr Callaghan to place winning bets.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment