White v Express Newspapers [2014] EWHC 657 (QB) (18 March 2014)

White v Express Newspapers [2014] EWHC 657 (QB) (18 March 2014)

The words complained of mean there are reasonable grounds to suspect that Mr Callaghan used insider information from Mr White to place winning bets, and so reasonable grounds to suspect both men acted dishonestly to enable Mr Callaghan to place winning bets. This is a defamatory allegation of fact, but falls short of alleging actual guilt.

Citation
[2014] EWHC 657
Parties
Claimant: James White; Claimant: John Callaghan; Defendant: Express Newspapers
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 March 2014
Procedural Posture
Libel Action / Preliminary Issue on Meaning of Words Complained of
Outcome
Determination of meaning as preliminary issue; words found to bear defamatory meaning as set out in judgment.
Legal Topics
Libel, Defamatory Meaning, Media Publications, Insider Information, Sports Betting

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James White

Claimant

John Callaghan

Claimant

Express Newspapers

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Libel Action / Preliminary Issue on Meaning of Words Complained of

  1. 1 Whether the words complained of are capable of bearing the meanings attributed by the claimants
  2. 2 Whether the words are defamatory of the claimants
  3. 3 Whether the words allege actual guilt or only suspicion

Ratio Decidendi

The words complained of mean there are reasonable grounds to suspect that Mr Callaghan used insider information from Mr White to place winning bets, and so reasonable grounds to suspect both men acted dishonestly to enable Mr Callaghan to place winning bets. This is a defamatory allegation of fact, but falls short of alleging actual guilt.

Court Disposition

Determination of meaning as preliminary issue; words found to bear defamatory meaning as set out in judgment.

Orders

  • The meaning of the words complained of is that there are reasonable grounds to suspect that Mr Callaghan used insider information communicated to him by Mr White to place winning bets, and so reasonable grounds to suspect that both men acted dishonestly to enable Mr Callaghan to place winning bets.