Dunham v Hull & East Riding Overseas Plastic Surgery
The responsibility for complying with time limits rests with the parties and their advisers. There was no sufficient or exceptional explanation for the delay, and the alleged advice from tribunal staff was not substantiated in a timely or detailed manner. The Employment Appeal Tribunal's exercise of discretion was proper and there is no arguable basis for appellate intervention.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Mrs J R Dunham; Defendant/respondent: Hull & East Riding Overseas Plastic Surgery
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure, Unfair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs J R Dunham
Claimant/appellant
Hull & East Riding Overseas Plastic Surgery
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Appeal Tribunal erred in refusing an extension of time for filing a notice of appeal by one day
- 2 Whether the appellant was entitled to rely on advice allegedly given by tribunal staff regarding method and timing of filing
Ratio Decidendi
The responsibility for complying with time limits rests with the parties and their advisers. There was no sufficient or exceptional explanation for the delay, and the alleged advice from tribunal staff was not substantiated in a timely or detailed manner. The Employment Appeal Tribunal's exercise of discretion was proper and there is no arguable basis for appellate intervention.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- Application for extension of time refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment