S (A Child) & L (A Child), In the Matter Of [2024] EWFC 108 (B) (05 February 2024)
The court found that both parents engaged in inappropriate arguments and some physical altercations in the presence of the children, but most serious allegations of physical abuse were not proved on the balance of probabilities due to lack of independent or contemporaneous evidence. The father's behaviour since April 2020 constituted a campaign of controlling and coercive conduct against the mother, including emotionally abusive conduct towards the children by denigrating the mother and attempting to alienate them. The father's persistent, unsupported allegations and use of proceedings to abuse the mother were found to be emotionally harmful and controlling. The mother was found to have...
- Citation
- [2024] EWFC 108 (B)
- Parties
- Applicant: F; First Respondent: M; Second and Third Respondents: S & L (through their 16.4 Children's Guardian Georgia Mills)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 February 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Children Act 1989 Proceedings (child Arrangements Order) / Fact Finding Hearing
- Outcome
- Findings of fact made; most serious allegations not proved; father's conduct found to be controlling and emotionally abusive; further welfare hearing required to determine child arrangements.
- Legal Topics
- Child Arrangements Order, Domestic Abuse, Fact Finding Hearing, Parental Responsibility, Emotional Harm, Coercive and Controlling Behaviour
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
F
Applicant
M
First Respondent
S & L (through their 16.4 Children's Guardian Georgia Mills)
Second and Third Respondents
Procedural Posture
Children Act 1989 Proceedings (child Arrangements Order) / Fact Finding Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether either parent has perpetrated domestic abuse or caused harm to the children
- 2 Whether the allegations of physical, emotional, or psychological abuse by either parent are proved on the balance of probabilities
- 3 Whether the conduct of either parent has caused or is likely to cause emotional harm to the children
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that both parents engaged in inappropriate arguments and some physical altercations in the presence of the children, but most serious allegations of physical abuse were not proved on the balance of probabilities due to lack of independent or contemporaneous evidence. The father's behaviour since April 2020 constituted a campaign of controlling and coercive conduct against the mother, including emotionally abusive conduct towards the children by denigrating the mother and attempting to alienate them. The father's persistent, unsupported allegations and use of proceedings to abuse the mother were found to be emotionally harmful and controlling. The mother was found to have...
Court Disposition
Findings of fact made; most serious allegations not proved; father's conduct found to be controlling and emotionally abusive; further welfare hearing required to determine child arrangements.
Orders
- Findings of fact as set out in the judgment
- Father's contact to remain supervised pending welfare determination
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment