K and D (Children: Sexual Abuse Findings), Re
The judge's findings of sexual abuse and identification of F as perpetrator were based on a thorough evaluation of medical evidence, behavioural indicators, and inferences from F's disengagement; the appeal court found no justification to interfere with the trial judge's factual findings.
- Parties
- Appellant: F (D's father); First Respondent: Local Authority; Second Respondent: Mother; Third and Fourth Respondents: Children's Guardian (for Third and Fourth Respondents); Fifth Respondent: X (Mother's partner)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (care Proceedings) / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Abuse Findings, Care Orders, Failure to Protect, Fact Finding Hearings, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
F (D's father)
Appellant
Local Authority
First Respondent
Mother
Second Respondent
Children's Guardian (for Third and Fourth Respondents)
Third and Fourth Respondents
X (Mother's partner)
Fifth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (care Proceedings) / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred in finding that K had been sexually abused
- 2 Whether the judge erred in finding that D suffered sexual harm
- 3 Whether the judge erred in finding that F was the perpetrator of sexual abuse
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's findings of sexual abuse and identification of F as perpetrator were based on a thorough evaluation of medical evidence, behavioural indicators, and inferences from F's disengagement; the appeal court found no justification to interfere with the trial judge's factual findings.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Findings of sexual abuse and perpetrator (F) upheld
- Care plan for children to remain in long-term fostering approved
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment