F v J
The Employment Tribunal erred in law by setting too high a threshold for anonymity, requiring objective proof and medical evidence of harm, rather than assessing whether the claimant’s concerns had a reasonable foundation. The evidence showed that the claimant’s fears were genuinely and reasonably held, and the interference with open justice was minor. Anonymity for both parties was necessary and not contrary to the public interest.
- Parties
- Appellant: F; Respondent: J
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; tribunal decision set aside; anonymity order granted for both parties.
- Legal Topics
- Disability Discrimination, Anonymity Orders, Open Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
F
Appellant
J
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal applied the correct legal test in refusing anonymity for the claimant under Rule 50 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- 2 Whether the claimant's concerns about future professional harm justified derogation from the principle of open justice
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal erred in law by setting too high a threshold for anonymity, requiring objective proof and medical evidence of harm, rather than assessing whether the claimant’s concerns had a reasonable foundation. The evidence showed that the claimant’s fears were genuinely and reasonably held, and the interference with open justice was minor. Anonymity for both parties was necessary and not contrary to the public interest.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; tribunal decision set aside; anonymity order granted for both parties.
Orders
- Both parties to be anonymised throughout these proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment