F v M
The children should remain living with their father due to overwhelming evidence that the mother persistently breached court orders, caused emotional and educational harm, failed to support contact, and attempted to influence the children against the father. Supervised contact with the mother is necessary until she engages with therapy and the local authority deems supervision unnecessary. The sibling bond and the children's welfare require they not be separated.
- Parties
- Applicant: F; Respondent: M
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Family / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Children to remain living with the father; supervised contact with the mother; s.91(14) order for 3 years.
- Legal Topics
- Child Arrangements Order, Enforcement of Contact, Change of Residence, Supervised Contact, Section 91(14) Children Act 1989
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
F
Applicant
M
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the children should reside with the father or mother
- 2 Whether contact with the mother should be supervised
- 3 Whether the mother breached previous Child Arrangements Orders
Ratio Decidendi
The children should remain living with their father due to overwhelming evidence that the mother persistently breached court orders, caused emotional and educational harm, failed to support contact, and attempted to influence the children against the father. Supervised contact with the mother is necessary until she engages with therapy and the local authority deems supervision unnecessary. The sibling bond and the children's welfare require they not be separated.
Court Disposition
Children to remain living with the father; supervised contact with the mother; s.91(14) order for 3 years.
Orders
- Children to reside with the father.
- Contact with the mother to be supervised until local authority and father agree supervision is unnecessary.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment