A and T (Children) (Appeal: Duration of section 91(14) order), Re
The judge below erred by imposing a blanket three-year restriction on all section 8 applications without explaining or considering proportionality. The restriction was disproportionate given F's conduct and the circumstances; a more tailored approach was required, limiting the 'lives with' order restriction to three years, the 'spend time with' order restriction to 15 months, and discharging other restrictions immediately.
- Parties
- Appellant: F; Respondent: M
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Family Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Section 91(14) Order, Children's Welfare, Duration of Barring Orders, Parental Alienation, Domestic Abuse Allegations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
F
Appellant
M
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the three-year section 91(14) order restricting applications under section 8 of the Children Act 1989 was proportionate
- 2 Whether the judge below erred in determining the duration of the order
Ratio Decidendi
The judge below erred by imposing a blanket three-year restriction on all section 8 applications without explaining or considering proportionality. The restriction was disproportionate given F's conduct and the circumstances; a more tailored approach was required, limiting the 'lives with' order restriction to three years, the 'spend time with' order restriction to 15 months, and discharging other restrictions immediately.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Section 91(14) restriction on 'lives with' orders upheld for three years
- Section 91(14) restriction on 'spend time with' orders extended to 30 April 2026 (approximately 15 months)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment